Long Live the King

wanderingmercenary asked: [ TEXT: Gangrel. Earth to Gangrel. Pick up your phone godsdamnit.]

[text: I’m busy. Don’t text me unless someone died. …Did somebody die? Was it Emm? Hot damn! Bring out the confetti and streamers- it’s a party!]

Reblog - Posted 1 day ago

sonofgrima:

ask-king-gangrel:

((Well, here’s the problem the way I see it. I’ve been known to make use of strong language myself, for example, “childish” or “pathetic.” I only do so, however, when I wish to make a generalized statement towards the community or a subgroup of the community. This is usually handled well, and most people, even if they disagree with my assertions, respect my position on the issue at hand. After all, I’m not pointing fingers. Instead, I remain “above it all” even when I take the stand.

When you use such a forceful tone in a one on one interaction, however, you make the discussion less about the issue and more about a specific person, even if that was not your original intention. This can be seen as aggressive and, God forbid, childish- the very accusation that you may or may not have attempted to throw upon someone else.

This can be seen as very off putting. It’s not exactly pleasant being slandered, and though I may shrug off arrows with ease, know that many others lack that capability. That kind of tone demonizes people, and while I may be okay with playing the villain on occasion, do know that it’s a rare characteristic.

Perhaps nobody will say anything at all, but always assume that nobody will forget the tone that you take with others in one on one interactions. Direct insults indicate hostility and agitation- negative traits even in my book. At least, that’s the way I’ve always seen it.

Well, that’s just my viewpoint on the issue, at least: there’s a difference between group and individual interactions, and different tones work best in different situations.

Then again, maybe I’m biased. Who knows. After all, I obviously don’t mind being the bad guy if I’m keeping this up. Ahahaha!))

//- No no, you raise a good point!

(trimming with a read more because it got rather long.. oops!)

Read More

((Hurtful? No. Rude? Very. I assure you that no one has managed to hurt my feelings for years now. I am a firm believer in the phrase: “words can never hurt me.”

But they can irritate me, and nothing irritates me more than rudeness save for self depreciation and timidity.

At the very least, however, you said what you meant and you meant what you said. I can respect that. I know that, to many people in this community, I am seen as rather intimidating and abrasive. Maybe it’s my muse; maybe it’s my tone. Whatever it is, I know it took courage to speak against me.

Good on you for that.))

Reblog - Posted 1 day ago - via / Source with 5 notes
Anonymous asked: And yet you banged Aversa. I'm pretty sure those anti-gravity breasts alone count as 'questionable objects.'

"I prefer the term ‘national treasures.’"

Reblog - Posted 3 days ago with 3 notes
Anonymous asked: Why don't you date Anna? Or a few of them? ...Or all of them? Don't most people have twin kinks?

"But how would I possibly know they were twins? What if they were, say, an aunt and a niece?

Or even worse, a mother and a daughter? 

Were you aware that girls as young as fourteen can bear children with minimal complications? For all the ‘Annas’ in this world, have you ever seen one that looked younger than eighteen or older than twenty seven? Who knows if they age at the same rate as the rest of us do.

As a policy, I don’t put my penis into questionable objects.”

Reblog - Posted 3 days ago with 5 notes
agony-loves-company asked: By douchy Hawke, do you mean aggressive/charming?

((By douchey Hawke, I mean “Heath Hawke”.

Slap that name into a deviantart search and have a field day. He was my first OC, and he will likely be the last.))

Reblog - Posted 3 days ago
madkinggangrel asked: ZAEED??

((Close, but no cigar. I won’t be taking any more guesses, since I think I’m done for the night, but I will tell you that…

the right answer was Javik all along!))

Reblog - Posted 5 days ago with 1 note
I think it's time we talked

smrelly:

Dad, no

Reblog - Posted 5 days ago - via / Source with 85 notes
Anonymous asked: "Foxy Boxes" *Waits for reaction to see KG prove her knowledge of correct response*

((Well, don’t hold your breath, kid. 

In fact, you may want to grab your tissue box and your lifetime membership card to Weenie Hut Junior’s because I had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. 

Until I googled it.

And that guy from Yugioh popped up on the search page. And as for the “foxy boxes” thing, I have no idea where that joke is from, if it actually is a joke. I do not understand the context behind it, and please, do not explain it to me. I guarantee that I will not take the time to read it.

But I digress. After glancing at the Yugioh pictures and taking a deep, tired sigh, I googled “imhotep the mummy” images to find a new picture to add to the one image that I use as my quote faceclaim endquote. I did this because that stupid cheeky smile that Imhotep has in that one image that I had could never express the emotion that I felt after googling your post.

Foo’, didn’t I already say that I didn’t watch Yu-gi-oh? Didn’t I say that the only Malik I knew was from Assassin’s Creed? Now then, I don’t like a lot of things in this world, but I especially do not enjoy repeating myself. And what did you do? 

You made me repeat myself. Bitch.

You made me google an unhappy picture of Imhotep, you made me save it to my computer, and you made me repeat myself.

Don’t do it again, or I’ll take those foxy boxes and shove them so far up your ass, it will defy my knowledge of correct anatomy.))

Reblog - Posted 5 days ago
Anonymous asked: I grilled you a hamburger milord... would you care for a bite?

"I’d bite off my own tongue first."

Reblog - Posted 1 week ago with 2 notes

ask-king-gangrel:

sonofgrima said: This could be dangerous, fufufu. I’m quite entertained by a friendly debate although for some reason people seem to think I get worked up or angry for some reason when I’m just over here being like ‘yay talking!’

((Well now, you may want to take…

((Well, here’s the problem the way I see it. I’ve been known to make use of strong language myself, for example, “childish” or “pathetic.” I only do so, however, when I wish to make a generalized statement towards the community or a subgroup of the community. This is usually handled well, and most people, even if they disagree with my assertions, respect my position on the issue at hand. After all, I’m not pointing fingers. Instead, I remain “above it all” even when I take the stand.

When you use such a forceful tone in a one on one interaction, however, you make the discussion less about the issue and more about a specific person, even if that was not your original intention. This can be seen as aggressive and, God forbid, childish- the very accusation that you may or may not have attempted to throw upon someone else.

This can be seen as very off putting. It’s not exactly pleasant being slandered, and though I may shrug off arrows with ease, know that many others lack that capability. That kind of tone demonizes people, and while I may be okay with playing the villain on occasion, do know that it’s a rare characteristic.

Perhaps nobody will say anything at all, but always assume that nobody will forget the tone that you take with others in one on one interactions. Direct insults indicate hostility and agitation- negative traits even in my book. At least, that’s the way I’ve always seen it.

Well, that’s just my viewpoint on the issue, at least: there’s a difference between group and individual interactions, and different tones work best in different situations.

Then again, maybe I’m biased. Who knows. After all, I obviously don’t mind being the bad guy if I’m keeping this up. Ahahaha!))

Reblog - Posted 1 week ago - via / Source with 5 notes